Case Law Of NoteArticle: May 15, 2014 | Malpractice AlertsMalpractice Alerts Archived
In a recent 4-3 decision, Daniel v Daniel, Slip Opinion No. 2104-Ohio-1161, the Ohio Supreme Court held that unvested military benefits earned during marriage fall within the definition of marital property in Ohio Revised Code 3105.171 (A)(3)(a) and must be considered for division under Ohio Revised Code 3105.171 (C).
Justice O’Neill, writing for the majority, said the statute does not distinguish between vested or unvested retirement benefits. He noted that the Ohio Supreme Court in Hoyt v. Hoyt, 53 Ohio St.3d 177(1990) held that vested pension benefits are marital property. However, the Court had never addressed unvested benefits in this context.
OBLIC has published the contents document or multimedia piece for informational purposes only, and it should not be construed as providing legal advice. We hope the use of these materials will help Ohio attorneys avoid potential legal malpractice problems and serve as a tool for building and maintaining strong, professional law practices. The content has been carefully researched and checked. However, this document or multimedia piece should not be relied upon as a substitute for full examination of the law and your own professional judgment. You may need to revise the procedures to meet your specific practice needs.